Gradesheet Crim 3103 Advanced Qualitative Methods, 2nd term
2023-24, MWF, 11.30-12.30, MMH202
proposed marking scale for classmark (engagement exercises):
Bonus=A21 10=A-20 9=B18.5 8=B-17.5
7=C16 6=C-15 5=D14 <4=F10
#
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
0
|
1
|
***
|
class 25
|
prop20
|
proj30
|
pres25
|
total
|
comments
|
1074572 |
*
|
*
|
e
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
***
|
A+ 22
|
B15
|
A 25
|
A21
|
A 83
|
tattoos
|
1068267 |
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
e**
|
A+ 22
|
B+15.5
|
A+ 27
|
A 21
|
A 85
|
crime scenes
|
1072322 |
*
|
*
|
e
|
*
|
|
*
|
|
*
|
|
*
|
*
|
***
|
A-21
|
A-16
|
A 25
|
A 21
|
A 83
|
sexting
|
1073523 |
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
e
|
*
|
e
|
e
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
***
|
A- 20
|
B+15.5
|
A+ 29
|
A- 20
|
A 84
|
gymetiquette
|
1077102 |
*
|
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
|
|
*
|
**
|
A-20
|
B15
|
B+ 23
|
A- 20
|
B+ 78
|
homelessness
|
1075436
|
|
|
*
|
|
e
|
*
|
e
|
*
|
|
|
|
e
|
C+ 17
|
A-16
|
B 22.5
|
ex
|
B 73
|
mentalhealth
|
1075398 |
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
*
|
e
|
*
|
*
|
*e
|
A 21
|
A-16
|
A+ 27
|
A 21
|
A 85
|
luigimangione
|
N=7
|
4
|
5
|
4
|
5
|
3
|
7
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
5
|
6
|
6
|
|
7
|
|
6
|
|
|
Assignments: All assignments are (in general) excuseable but
not makeupable.
#1.15. What is the consequence of the 'shift in narrative' from the
hero to the victim (wrt news coverage of westray)?
#2. 17. How could you diagram Shirley's story (perhaps in comparison
with the other two narratives?
#3. 1.29. What (and why) is there a standard structure to the (AIDS)
survivors stories.
#4. 2.05. Why are emotions important for ethnographies?
#5. 2.19. As discused in class, why is the villain narrative
important?
#6. 2.21. How are these (sculptures) visual metaphors, and how are
they useful?
#7. 2.26. Pick one pro tip from the video, "How to
Interview Victims like a Pro," 6mins e
#8. 2.28. In lieu of class, how informed are the interviewing
techniques suggested in the "Research manual: Interviewing
Techniques in Domestic Violence Cases: In-Service Training For
Police," link
Use ** "How to Interview Victims like a Pro," 6mins, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R72z4ayrFCQ
#9. 3.14. Attendance and participation.
#10. 3.19. Attendance and participation.
#11. 3.24. Attendance and participation.
##. Attendance at presentations.
proposals and projects:
tattoos: 2 single spaced pages with
subtitles, and refspage; interesting topic, and one which goes far
back in history, and which became very popular after Captain Cook
brought evidence of them back to Europe; like you say, there are
different reasons for tattoos, which means there might also be
different 'communities', so it might be more useful to limit the
sampling to university students; that would make it easier to make
the conclusions more generalizable, and provide a uniform sample;
additionally, the 'defiant' tattoo might be a sign of deviance, but
'conformity' is a subcultural sign as well; overall, this is a good
topic, and easily doable; limiting the sample might be better, which
will make it easier to get examples; including some in this proposal
might have been nice. B75% 15/20 Presentation: appreciated
the information about the participants, good themes found;
suggestion not to read too much of the slides, better to build the
connection with the crowd; good insights into the self-perceptions
of the interviewees, and well structured questions; text on slides a
bit small, especially on participants page. overall, excellent work.
A 84% 21/25 Project: 27 slides (!), with TOC, a few
references, pictures, and (too much) text on the slides; the work is
quite comprehensive overall, some history, the method, and
interviews with questions and answers; one slide has text in the
notes section, which makes for a short essay component; overall,
this is an excellent project in terms of its scope, the findings,
and their interpretations. A 25/30 85%
homelessness: 5 double-spaced
pages with subtitles, and 2 references; the topic of advocacy is a
good one, because of the pervasiveness of social media in these
days, and applying it to homelessness is interesting, however the
scope of the research is too broad; perhaps leave out the interviews
and look at the case studies and content analysis, as that will give
you lots to work with; overall, good topic, could be narrowed down
to make it more workable. B 75% 1520 Presentation:
interesting topic, and hindered by reading off slides, makes it hard
to feel connected; question if the social media people producing
videos are helping; the human rights angle is good; presentation
style could be more structured, with less repetition; overall,
excellent work. A- 8% 20/25 Project:
crime scenes: about 10 double
spaced pages (too long!), with pictures, subtitles, and references
page; there are some good ideas here, based on how the public reacts
to the crimes which occurred, which seems curious, to associate a
place with a crime, literally to embed a place; there are many
examples and themes, so it might be good to narrow them down a bit;
overall, good topic, good organization, perhaps use fewer examples
or themes. B+77% 15.5/20 Presentation: interesting topic,
good use of online materials; displays community emotional response;
spoke about slides, issues, well; slides could be more dynamic; key
findings, narratives well done. overall, excellent work. A 84% 21/25
Project: 14 slides, showcasing reactions to homelessness
using a novel form of data, social media posts with names redacted;
separate essay 14 pages dspaced including titlepage and interview
list.
luigimangione: 10 slides with
notes, pictures, and a few references; this is a good topic, as it
is timely, and poses some questions about how image is created and
reflects innocence and guilt in a society which heavily uses
(social) media as a source of information; using content analysis
and/or discourse analysis to get at the themes is a good methods
choice, although it is a bit unclear how a sample will be selected
or what themes will be isolated; overall, excellent work. A- 80%
16/20 Presentation: overwhelmingly interesting topic, and
concept of pretty privilege; talked too fast, difficult to
understand; slides had minimal information, explained well. overall,
excellent work. A 84% 21/25 Project:
sexting: 3 double spaced pages plus
refspage, 2 subtitles; the idea of looking at how sexual risk is
topicalized in the mainstream media is workable, and should be able
to get at the (adult) crisis of sexting among teenagers; keeping the
sample 'opportunistic' will leave the method more flexible, and
focusing on discourse will separate it from the act; overall, this
is a good topic, and made workable by looking at published
mainstream discourse; including some text examples would have added
to the analysis; overall, good topic, and has the potential of
adding some insights to the (dominant) discourse. A- 80% 16/20 Presentation:
very interesting topic to learn about; slides were designed well,
easy to read; so glad you brought up the snapchat and covid issue;
nice mention of amanda todd; shows a topic about which not much has
been done, and seems well informed; themes of laws, risk, and gender
explained well. overall, excellent work. A 84% 21/25 Project:
gymetiquette: four well designed
and laid out pages with pictures and subtitles, no references; this
is an interesting topic, because how does a person learn to 'do
gym'?; the sample size is large and might be narrowed down to make
it more manageable; the interview questions are quite structured,
and the whole surveying is going to take a lot of time, so perhaps
it could be made shorter, smaller?; why compare workers to users?;
an obvious angle might be gender, and how 'doing gym' is different
for females than males, and so perhaps including that as a
sub-themes would be useful; overall, this is a good topic, and needs
to be more manageable, and should be referenced. B+15.5 77% Presentation:
unanimously interesting topic, perhaps the scope was a bit large;
read from slides which made it somewhat dry, and videos hard to see;
the interviews and thematic analysis show a lot of work. overall,
excellent work. A- 80% 20/25 Project: overall, detailed and
comprehensive, it shows a lot of work. A+ 22
mentalhealth: 3 single spaced
pages with subtitles and references; the idea of looking at social
media is good, because it is a more democratic forum than
traditional media; the sampling seems to be voluntary, so it is hard
to predict the uptake; some themes seem to be predictable, eg. the
increase in perceptions of mental problems, and that they might be
gendered and related to the transition to college, often at a
distance from home; overall, good topic, with a lot of resources.
A-16 80% Project: