Getting very near the end
What we learn about literary journalism by browsing, part 2
There's been another fair bit of reporting and responding on the "finding literary nonfiction" forum. I hope everybody has had a chance to read everything; I want again to spend much of the time we have together tonight discussing people's different experiences. I'm expecting people will have some things to say about the way their finding the article gives them some ideas about the status of such articles in the world, about what characteristics of the article made them comfortable -- and uncomfortable -- with the ideas about literary journalism we've been discussing, and about the context in which they found the article.I'm also going to be asking everyone to be doing some more reading about literary journalism, against the background of what you've come to know about it so far. More on that next week; in the meantime, have a look back at the postings in the bibliography wiki and the list of relevant texts.When I said that I was under the erroneous assumption that we had one more meeting than we actually do. I had hoped to do that for one week and then ask people, for the last week, to find a particular piece by any of the literary journalists who are, by consensus, the important ones, and read it and place it in the context of what you know now about the form, its practitioners, the contexts they work in, and the ways they structure their work.