Gradesheet for 3503 wrongful conviction!, fall 2024/25    outline    weblog    resources
proposed marking scale for classmark (engagement exercises): Bonus=A21  10=A-20   9=B18.5  8=B-17.5  7=C16  6=C-15  5=D14  4=D-13 <4=F10

ID
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0
class25
prop20
proj30
xam25
final
comment
1072599 *

*








B-14



anderson
1074960
*
*
*
*







A17



junkscience
1076260
*
*
*








15



menendez
1068267 *
*
*
e







A17



interrogation
1074576
*


*







B-14



mccollumbrown
1070458 *

*
*







A-16



stephentruscott
1071005 *

*
*







B-14



stevenavery
1075430

*
*
*







B15



philleon
1074456 *
*
*
*







C13



gypsyrose
1075637 *

*








B-14



morin
1073148 *
*

*







B15



brian
1072061
*

*
*







B-14



westmemphis3
1072476 *
*
*
e







B-14



cogbiases
1072287

*
*








B-14



raplyrics
1076331 *
*
*
*







C13



georgeallen
1072322 *
*
*
*







A17



women
1075449 *
*
*
*







A-16



stephentruscott
1077262 *
*
*








C13



darrylhunt2
1077467 *
*
*
*







A-16



stephentruscott
1075287 *
*
*
*







A-16



charlessmith
1075299 *
*

*







B-14



mullins
1075557 *
*
*
*







C13



marcellus
1073948 *

*
*







-----



-----
1075621 *
*

*







B-14



cjohnson
1077374 *

*








B15



darrylhunt
1076847 *
*
*
*







B15



briananderson
1072837 *
*









B15



eyewitness
1072472 *










B15



mccullough
1081539
*
*
*
*







B-14



williammj
1074722 *
*
*
*







C13



woodhouse
1072030 *
*
*
e







A17



amandaknox
1078758 *
*









A17



stinney
1077378
*
*








B15



memphis3
1078529 *
*
*
*







A-16



stephentruscott
1077132 *
*
*
*







C13



baltovich
1072236 *
*
*
*







A-16



stephentruscott
1077830
*
*
*
*







B+15.5



guypaul
1078286 *

*
*







A17



kyleunger
1069566 *
*
*
e







A-16



truscott
1073695 *
*









A-16



avery
1077753 *
*
*








B15



mccullough
1077919 *
*
*
*







B+15.5



gregparsons
1077568 *
*

*







B15



banderson
1075398 *
*
*
*







B-14



sophonow
1077334 *
*
*
*







B-14



mrbig
1069567 *
*
*
*







B15



wrongfuls
1078316
*
*
*
*






B-14



sophonow
1075633 *
*
*
*







A-16



romeophilleon
1072089 *
*
*
*







B15



racism
1066473 *


e







e



-----
1075613 *
*
*
*







B-14



clarencewood
1071939 *
*
*
*







B-14



moreracism
1075393
*
*
e
e







B15



moreeyewitness
1079284
*

*








A-16



romeophilleon
1072826 *
*
*
*







B-14



confessions
1075181 *
*
*








B15



rubincarter
1077435
*
*
*
*







B-14



tammybouvette
N=58
53
42
46
36







56






Assignments: Most assignments are excuseable but not makeupable
Q1: wed 18th, watch Justice Denied (below), and discuss whether the charge/conviction is fault/error based or a cognitive bias like tunnel vision, racism. Due Fri 20th
Q2: wed 2nd, watch the video for the Guy Paul Morin case (45 mins), and briefly summarize what went wrong, in 2 pages or less, for handin/email on Friday, 4th
Q3: wed 9th, how does your group vote in the Gruenke case.
Q4: wed 16th, have you changed your mind in the Gruenke case?


research work:
anderson -- 2 dspaced pages plus mixed refspage; interesting case, and it is no surprise that it involves a racial element; developing the race angle more would strengthen the analysis, and subtitles would help organize the themes more; overall, good beginning. B-14

morin -- 2 pages dspaced, and several references; several cognitive biases are discussed, eg. confirmation bias, and how they affected the case; this introduces an important psychological angle on the case; try using subtitles to organize the discussion of biases more. Good beginning. B-14

philleon -- 4 dspaced pages with subtitles, plus refspage; there is a lot of detail here on the case and where it went wrong; the literature on false confessions is especially important; good organization and discussion of themes; including some photos would add a visual dimension; good beginning on an interesting case. B15

memphis3 -- 2 sspaced text, plus titlepage, and some refs (none academic); it sounds like marginality was the reason behind the tunnel vision, in that it was easier to scapegoat the boys than find the true killer; developing that theme more would strengthen the analysis; overall, good beginning. B15

avery -- 3 dspaced pages plus titlepage and 3 mixed refs; various aspects of the case are discussed, all of which have a part to play in this case; using subtitles will help organize those themes more; overall, excellent beginning. A-16

junkscience -- 4 sspaced pages including titlepage, extensive refs page, subtitles, and photos; excellent discussion of cases, all of which featured hair comparison analysis, now considered highly unreliable; overall, excellent work, and presented well. A17

truscott -- 5 dspaced pages including titlepage, subtitles, and refspage; good discussion of the cognitive biases relevant to this case, and how they got in the way of finding the true killer; there is some evidence of a soldier from the nearby base who was luring children, and that maybe the police knew about it... overall, excellent work. A-16

eyewitness -- 2.5 dspaced pages plus refspage; this shows a good understanding of the issues, and more development of those issues which effect reliability would develop the analysis more; subtitles would also strengthen the themes as well; good cases, perhaps some photos would be interesting; good beginning. B15

darrylhunt -- 3 dspaced pages plus titlepage and refspage; there are some important issues here, eg. the impact on public consciousness, which could be demonstrated perhaps by media excerpts; and stylistically, subtitles would help organize the themes more; overall, well written. B15

stinney -- 2 sspaced pages with subtitles, pictures, and 3 (popular) refs, needs some academic refs too; there are a lot of important issues here, such as racial bias and 'rush to trial'; the media angle might be difficult to find articles, but it certainly would be important too; overall, ambitious, and well organized. A17

women -- 2 sspaced pages with subtitles, and a refspage with multiple academic sources; this is a novel topic, and there are not that many women wrongfuls (except perhaps in Ontario), and some are quite famous (like Lindy Chamberlain); the bias against 'bad moms' is a good interpretive approach; excellent topic. A17

stephentruscott -- a group of five; 3 sspaced pages with subtitles, and a refspage of media sources; each section is clearly authored, but for the project just show it as group written; there is lots of detail on the case, and it is summarized well; using media excerpts will better support the analysis, and photos could be used to illustrate it; one detail that comes up in cbc coverage is that there was a known sex offender at the nearby airbase; overall, good work. A-16

romeophilleon -- two people; 3 sspaced pages with subtitles, and webrefs page; well-written, and covers all the issues, but also leaves some questions, such as should the police have investigated the possibility of a false confession?; media coverage of his release might be interesting to look at; overall, excellent beginning. A-16

wrongfuls -- 1.5 sspaced pages, with subtitles, graph, and 2 references; a good overview of some of the issues; more detail on the work of the Innocence project, for example, would add some history and depth to the analysis, given the difficulty of examining all of these factors; overall, good beginning. B15

mccollumbrown -- 2 sspaced pages with subtitles and a web-refspage; rather than being the most notorious of cases, this bears the signs of so many cases, marginal suspects, coerced confessions, tunnel vision, racism, and so on; does the media coverage at exoneration get at any of that? overall, some questions, good beginning. B-14

cjohnson -- 2 dspaced pages with subtitles, 2 webrefs; this is one of only a few NS cases, and illustrates some interesting features, such as (fabricated) graphic crime scene evidence; more on when and how the investigation went wrong, and how that was overturned, would add to the analysis; good beginning. B-14

darrylhunt2 -- such a typical case, eyewitnesses who were wrong, racism in a small place, tunnel vision perhaps; developing the cognitive and fault-based issues more would strengthen the analysis, and subtitles would help develop themes more; overall, good topic, could be developed more. C13

stevenavery -- 3 sspaced pages with titlepage, picture, subtitles, and mixedrefs; such a typical case: marginal suspect, suspect evidence, police suspicion and tunnel vision, inadequate witness... ; more on how the reform group worked to resolve such issues in the future would be interesting to develop; overall, good beginning. B-14

gypsyrose -- 2.5 dspaced pages with subtitles, and one movie ref; this is a very interesting case, and certainly puts her in the position of being abused, and kept virtual hostage by her mother; could a defense of self-defence be argued? -- developing that angle more explicitly would strengthen the analysis, as well as media coverage. C13

briananderson -- 2.5 sspaced pages with subtitles, photo, and 2 webrefs; an old case, and an otherwise cold case; it is amazing that it came back for review at all, and it would be interesting to look at media coverage and see whether it names racism as a factor; talking about racism and wrongfuls would also add; good beginning. B15

charlessmith -- 3 sspaced pages with subtitles, pictures, and mediarefs; good review of a couple of cases; more on why smith did what he did, and how he did it would strengthen the analysis, eg. why did he provide info to prosecute so many moms?; overall, this shows a lot of work, need more on the psychology of smith. A-16

cogbiases -- 5 sspaced pages in point form, with web mediarefs; this is a very detailed recantation of four cases, but there is very little about cognitive biases, highighting those more would add to the analysis; overall, good start with case descriptions. B-14

marcellus -- 3 dspaced pages with subtitles, and a media refspage; the 'research' and 'outcomes' sections seem more like something the government would do, and not proposed here, same as with the conclusion; the proposed scope of the research needs to be narrowed down more; C13

brian -- 4 dspaced text ages, plus titlepage, subtitles, and media refspage; this case should be notorious for the racism it displays; this is a good overview, and more on the role of the media would deepen the analysis; overall, good beginning. B15

tammybouvette -- 4 dspaced pages including titlepage, and (mostly media) refspage; the case description is fairly general, and it should have a summary of what the circumstances of the case were; however, the writing is clear, and the issues are explained well; overall, good beginning, should describe the case more. C13 reread: good application of the concepts, could have more refs. B-14

sophonow -- 2 people; 2.5 sspaced pages text with subtitles, general refspage, and titlepage; the case is described well, and the various problems are pointed out; what sort of safeguards could have prevented this miscarriage happening again?; overall, good beginning, needs more analysis, especially for two people. B- 14

baltovich -- 2 pages dspaced with subtitles, plus titlepage, and refs page with 2 refs; a basic description of the case, and what went wrong; including media coverage of the case would be interesting, especially since it seems to be implicated in the faulty testimony; what was the reason for the eventual exoneration? overall, good beginning. C13

mccullough -- 2 people; 2 sspaced, with subtitles, titlepage, and 4 webrefs; the case is interesting, and it seems that a major factor is the role of the police, which raises the question of what sort of safeguards would prevent such 'mistakes' happening?; good beginning and parallels to other cases. B15

gregparsons -- 2 sspaced pages with subtitles, plus titlepage and 2 refs; good detail on the case, and the police mistakes appear to have been systematic and biased; more on whether those mistakes were fault-based or cognitive-based would add to the analysis; overall, good beginning, there might even be media coverage. B+15.5

banderson -- 6 dspaced pages with subtitles, pictures, and several webrefs; the case is described well, and the writing is good; more on the racial angle, and how natives are more likely to be wrongfully convicted, etc., will strengthen the analysis, and show how the issues are more systemic. good beginning B15

mrbig -- 5 dspaced pages with titlepage, refspage, and subtitles; the issue is a good one, and this procedure can certainly lead to wrongful convictions; more detail on how they work, and when they don't, would add to the analysis; unger is a good example, are there others? good beginning. B-14

confessions -- 2.5 dspaced pages, with academic references; false confessions, as pointed out, are related to vulnerability quite often, such as youths, racial minorities, and the poor; and juries are more likely to convict if there's a confession even if it is retracted; good beginning, try using subtitles to organize themes. B-14

rubincarter -- 2 pages with subtitles and picture, and several references; good description of the case and all his troubles; more on the psychological trauma of being falsely accused and convicted would add to the analysis; overall, good case, good beginning. B15 

westmemphis3 -- 2 sspaced pages, 2 references; interesting case, and it is described well; using subtitles might help organize the themes more, and if the media has a role in sensationalizing the case, perhaps some examples can be found. good beginning, could have more on the psychological angle. B-14

mullins -- 3 dspaced pages plus several references; this is a good case, and notorious enough it is the subject of a cbc episode; using subtitles will help organize the different stages of the case, and perhaps there is also media coverage, eg. the Fifth Estate's "Death in the Family" which could be used; good beginning. B-14

williammj -- 2 sspaced pages plus extensive refspage; this is a good case, and was perhaps one of the first which D. Smith was involved in; the psychological reasons for why there was such a single-minded obsession with William could be developed more; otherwise, good beginning. B-14

woodhouse -- 2.5 dspaced pages, titlepage, and two media references; interesting case, because it's the Winnipeg police, and they are not using proper procedures; developing the psychological angle more would help explain their behaviour, and using subtitles would help organize the themes more; good case. C13

raplyrics -- 2 dspaced pages text, no references; this is a very inventive topic, and could be really interesting; including some examples, and perhaps referencing some videos would have added to the proposal, but they can be added to the project; overall, interesting topic, could organize it by cases, perhaps. B-14

racism -- 5 dspaced pages with subtitles, mixed references; good topic, especially as it is evident in so many cases in Canada, eg. Woodhouse, Mullins; perhaps there are recommendations for how to avoid racism in new cases? maybe look for federal reports referencing racism in wrongfuls?; good beginning. B15

guypaul -- 5pages dspaced including subtitles, titlepage, and refspage; the issue of junk science runs throughout the case, and underlies a lot of the mistakes the police and prosecution made, especially since they wanted to believe thy had a case, so there's a cognitive bias there too...; overall, good case, good treatment. B+15.5

kyleunger -- 5 dspaced pages including titlepage, pictures, and mixed refs; this shows a lot of review already, and major points of the case are mentioned; the mr big sting is especially egregious, because there is such an incentive to lie and admit to crimes not actually committed; excellent beginning. A17

amandaknox -- 2 sspaced pages with subtitles, pictures, and 3 references; the influence of the media in this case is important, from how it framed the issues to how it created the appearance of guilt and led to a rush to justice; making the documentary the focus of attention is a good idea; excellent beginning. A17

georgeallen -- 4 pages dspaced including subtitles, two references; cases like this seem so common, a likely suspect, a coerced confession, poor evidence which is later overturned, it sounds like a soap opera; perhaps there are pictures or news items which can be added in for interest?; overall, good, could have more detail C13

interrogation -- 6 dspaced pages including titlepage, 2 pages text with subtitles, 2 pages references!, and a blank page; excellent proposal, well written, and focused; keeping it case-based, but also examining the issues by themselves will work well; could use some pictures, excellent beginning A17

clarencewood -- 2.5 dspaced pages, several references; looking at court documents and media reports is ambitious, but would certainly fill in the full picture; adding a few here would show what they look like; overall, a thought out project, could use more detail. B-14

moreracism -- 2 dspaced pages with subtitles, academic references; the issue of racism is an important one in criminal justice and wrongful convictions; probably just focusing on floyd would be enough, and it certainly was part of a much bigger protest against police racism; overall, good beginning. B-14

moreeyewitness -- 2sspaced pages, webreferences, subtitles; an interesting case, and there is lots of detail; perhaps there is some media coverage which could be added; overall, good beginning. B15

menendez -- 2 dspaced pages, varied references; this is a good, contemporary case to examine, especially given the amount of media coverage; to see them as victims means they should have had a plausible self-defense; perhaps the role of the media is important in this injustice. B15